Towards a suitable size for the courts of Castilla-La Mancha

Authors

Keywords:

Electoral system, Castilla-La Mancha, constituency size, proportionality, representativeness

Abstract

The Castilla-La Mancha regional parliament is comprised of 33 deputies, although the regional Statute of Autonomy allows for a range between 25 and 35 members. This article argues and justifies that such a size is inappropriate for the region’s characteristics. To support this claim, a comparison with the other autonomous communities is conducted, demonstrating that this size is significantly lower than what would be appropriate based on population or the number of provinces. Additionally, a quantitative analysis of its effects reveals that the electoral system of Castilla-La Mancha exhibits low proportionality and representativeness, deviating from the norm observed in the rest of Spain. Furthermore, the article presents options to align the regional system with the others, thereby eliminating it as a source of political disputes, such as the contention over which provinces elect an even or odd number of deputies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALVAREZ, E. (2009), “Las reformas estatutarias y los sistemas electorales autonómicos”, Revista de Derecho Político, (75-76), pp. 457-485. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.75-76.2009.9099.

FERNANDEZ, C. (2020), “El Sistema Electoral de Castilla-La Mancha tras la Reforma de 2014. Análisis de sus Rendimientos y Propuestas de Mejora”, Parlamento y Constitución. Anuario, (21), pp. 11-38. Disponible en: https://parlamentoyconstitucion.cortesclm.es/recursos/anuarios/2020.pdf.

GALLAGHER, M. (1991), “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems”, Electoral Studies, 10, pp. 33–51. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-c.

KLINGEMANN, H.-D. (2009), The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.

LLERA, F. (1998), “Los rendimientos de los sistemas electorales de las Comunidades Autónomas. El predominio del bipartidismo imperfecto”, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, (82), pp. 127-158. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/40184054.

LOOSEMORE, J. Y HANBY, V. (1971), “The theoretical limits of maximum distortion: some analytic expressions for electoral systems”, British Journal of Political Science, 1(4), pp. 467-477.

OCAÑA, F. Y OÑATE, P. (1999), “Índices e indicadores del sistema electoral y del sistema de partidos. Una propuesta informática para su cálculo”, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, (86), pp. 223-245. Disponible en: https://reis.cis.es/index.php/reis/article/view/1197/1527.

OLIVER, J. (2011), Los Sistemas electorales autonómicos, Generalitat de Catalunya, Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics. Disponible en: https://www.gencat.cat/governacio/pub/sum/iea/ctA_15.pdf.

PENADÉS, A. Y SANTIUSTE, S. (2013), “La desigualdad en el sistema electoral español y el premio a la localización del voto”, Revista Española de Ciencia Política, (32), pp. 89–116. Disponible en: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37589.

RUIZ, F. (2013), “Austeridad versus Representatividad en la Ley Electoral de Castilla-La Mancha”, Parlamento y Constitución. Anuario, pp. 201-224. Disponible en: https://parlamentoyconstitucion.cortesclm.es/recursos/articulos/PyC15_Ruiz_Austeridad.pdf.

URDANOZ, J. (2005), Un nuevo marco conceptual para el análisis electoral, Universidad de La Rioja, Tesis doctoral. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/tesis/386.pdf.

Published

2024-12-10

How to Cite

Ruiz González, F. (2024). Towards a suitable size for the courts of Castilla-La Mancha. Revista Anuario Parlamento Y Constitución, (25), 181–203. Retrieved from https://parlamentoyconstitucion.cortesclm.es/rapc/article/view/392

Issue

Section

ARTICLES