La interpretación y el diálogo democrático

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71206/rapc.109

Resumen

SUMARIO:

I. Introducción.
II. La dimensión del problema.
III. El originalismo.
IV. El nuevo originalismo.
V. El constitucionalismo vivo/ La interpretación dinámica.
VI. El originalismo vivo (living originalism).
VII. Dworkin, la lectura moral y la "novela en cadena".
VIII. El diálogo democrático y la interpretación en una comunidad de iguales.
IX. Bibliografía.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Estadísticas globales ℹ️

Totales acumulados desde su publicación
37
Visualizaciones
22
Descargas
59
Total

Citas

Ackerman, B. (1993), We the People, Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Allen Murphy, B. (2014), Scalia: A Court of One, New York: Simon & Schuster.

Bennett, R. & Solum, L. (2011), Constitutional Originalism: A Debate, New York: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801447938.001.0001

Berger, R. (1977), Government by Judiciary, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bork, R. (1990), The Tempting of America, New York: Simon & Schuster.

Dworkin, R. (1986), Law’s Empire, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Dworkin, R. (1997), "The Arduous Virtue of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia,

Tribe, and Nerve," Fordham Law Review, vol. 65, (1997).

Ely, J. (1980), Democracy and Distrust, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv102bj77

Fleming, J. (2015), Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793372.001.0001

Hart, H. (1961), The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jefferson Powell, H. (1985), "The Original Understanding of Original Intent,"Harvard Law Review 98: 897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1340880

Nino, C. (1991), The Ethics of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scalia, A. (2005), "Law and Language," First Things 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860510029608

Strauss, D. (2010), The Living Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sunstein, C. (1993), The Partial Constitution, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1341781

Sunstein, C. (2006), The Second Bill of Rights, New York: Basic Books.

Sunstein, C.; Schkade, D.; et al (2006), Are judges political? An empirical analysis of the Federal Judiciary, New York: Brookings Institution Press.

Tushnet, M. (1988), Red, White and Blue, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Tushnet, M. (1999), Taking the Constitution away from the Courts, Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822973

Waldron, J. (1999), Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001

Waldron, J. (2014), "Five to Four: Why do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?"The Yale Law Journal, vol. 123, n. 6, 1626-2133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2195768

Descargas

Publicado

2016-12-31

Cómo citar

Gargarella, R. (2016). La interpretación y el diálogo democrático. Revista Anuario Parlamento Y Constitución, (17), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.71206/rapc.109

Número

Sección

ESTUDIOS