La interpretación y el diálogo democrático
Resumen
SUMARIO:
I. Introducción.
II. La dimensión del problema.
III. El originalismo.
IV. El nuevo originalismo.
V. El constitucionalismo vivo/ La interpretación dinámica.
VI. El originalismo vivo (living originalism).
VII. Dworkin, la lectura moral y la "novela en cadena".
VIII. El diálogo democrático y la interpretación en una comunidad de iguales.
IX. Bibliografía.
Descargas
Citas
Ackerman, B. (1993), We the People, Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Allen Murphy, B. (2014), Scalia: A Court of One, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Bennett, R. & Solum, L. (2011), Constitutional Originalism: A Debate, New York: Cornell University Press.
Berger, R. (1977), Government by Judiciary, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bork, R. (1990), The Tempting of America, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Dworkin, R. (1986), Law’s Empire, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1997), "The Arduous Virtue of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia,
Tribe, and Nerve," Fordham Law Review, vol. 65, (1997).
Ely, J. (1980), Democracy and Distrust, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fleming, J. (2015), Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. (1961), The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jefferson Powell, H. (1985), "The Original Understanding of Original Intent,"Harvard Law Review 98: 897.
Nino, C. (1991), The Ethics of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scalia, A. (2005), "Law and Language," First Things 11.
Strauss, D. (2010), The Living Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, C. (1993), The Partial Constitution, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, C. (2006), The Second Bill of Rights, New York: Basic Books.
Sunstein, C.; Schkade, D.; et al (2006), Are judges political? An empirical analysis of the Federal Judiciary, New York: Brookings Institution Press.
Tushnet, M. (1988), Red, White and Blue, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tushnet, M. (1999), Taking the Constitution away from the Courts, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Waldron, J. (1999), Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldron, J. (2014), "Five to Four: Why do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?"The Yale Law Journal, vol. 123, n. 6, 1626-2133.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2016 Revista Anuario Parlamento y Constitución
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
